At a glance
PageLantern vs Checkly: the numbers
| What it costs and includes | PageLantern | Checkly |
|---|---|---|
| Paid entry price | Starter $9/mo ($7/mo billed annually); Team $24/mo ($19/mo annually) | Starter $24/mo billed annually for 50 uptime monitors, 25,000 API runs, and 3,000 browser/Playwright runs; extra runs are metered |
| Free tier | 15 monitors at 5-minute checks, including SSL expiry, domain expiry, heartbeat, and API checks with JSONPath assertions, plus 1 status page | Hobby: 10 monitors at 2-minute checks with 10,000 API and 1,000 browser check runs a month |
| Fastest checks | 1 minute on Starter; 30 seconds for 25 critical monitors on Team | 2 minutes on the free Hobby plan |
| History retention | 30 days on Free, 90 days on Starter, 1 year on Team | 7 days raw / 30 days aggregated on Hobby |
| Check types | HTTP, API with assertions, SSL expiry, domain expiry, DNS, TCP, heartbeat, and hosted browser checks (DNS and browser checks on paid plans) | HTTPS, TCP, DNS, ICMP, SSL/TLS, gRPC, traceroute, heartbeat, API, and Playwright/browser checks; developer-first and manageable as code |
| SMS alerts | None on Free; 50 a month on Starter; 200 a month on Team | SMS and phone alerts on paid plans |
| Team seats | 1 on Free, 3 on Starter, 10 on Team | 1 seat on Hobby |
Checkly figures were checked against the vendor’s published pricing on August 21, 2026 (source) and can change at any time. PageLantern figures are its published plans.
Developer-first synthetic monitoring
Checkly positioning
Hobby plan includes uptime monitors plus browser and API check runs; paid plans add more monitors, faster checks, more locations, SMS, phone, and Playwright capacity.
- Pick Checkly when
- Engineering teams that want monitoring as code, Playwright browser checks, API check volume, CLI workflows, and Terraform/Pulumi-style management.
- Pick PageLantern when
- PageLantern should win with non-specialist setup, pragmatic website/API/domain/DNS/heartbeat coverage, and an operations UI that does not require synthetic-test expertise.
- Be honest about
- Avoid claiming Playwright-as-code parity. PageLantern now offers hosted browser checks on paid plans, but Checkly remains stronger for Playwright suites, monitoring as code, parallel synthetic scheduling, and a larger public-location network.
Market Map
Competitive comparison matrix
| Product | Category | Best fit | PageLantern angle | Competitor strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PageLantern | Focused website and API monitoring workspace | Small SaaS teams, agencies, site owners, and operators managing public assets. | Simple setup, HTTP/API/SSL/domain/DNS/TCP/heartbeat/DOM checks, incidents, status pages, audit, and fleet digest. | Earlier product; fewer mature integrations and less deep synthetic/browser/on-call coverage than larger platforms. |
| Checkly | Developer-first synthetic monitoring | Engineering teams that want monitoring as code, Playwright browser checks, API check volume, CLI workflows, and Terraform/Pulumi-style management. | PageLantern should win with non-specialist setup, pragmatic website/API/domain/DNS/heartbeat coverage, and an operations UI that does not require synthetic-test expertise. | Checkly is stronger for Playwright, multistep synthetic journeys, developer workflows, and checks managed as code. |
| UptimeRobot | Budget uptime monitoring | Hobby projects and teams that mainly need many inexpensive uptime, ping, port, and keyword checks and can live without SSL, domain, DNS, heartbeat, or API monitoring on the free plan. | PageLantern includes on its free tier checks UptimeRobot now paywalls — SSL expiry, domain expiry, heartbeat/cron, and API checks with assertions — plus an alert channel that can be a webhook, Slack, or Teams, alongside incidents, audit trails, and fleet reports in one focused workspace. | UptimeRobot offers the largest raw free monitor count among the hosted tools in this audit (50), three months of free history, a broad installed base, and a simple price story for basic HTTP, keyword, ping, and port checks. |
| Pingdom | Synthetic and web performance monitoring | Businesses that want a long-running synthetic monitoring brand with uptime, page speed, transaction checks, and SolarWinds ecosystem reach. | PageLantern can compete as a lighter, faster-to-understand product for owners and small teams that do not need enterprise synthetic monitoring. | Pingdom is stronger for mature synthetic monitoring, transaction flows, page-speed diagnostics, and enterprise scale. |
| Better Stack | Monitoring plus incident platform | Teams that want uptime monitoring tied to on-call, incident response, status pages, logs, metrics, and broader observability workflows. | PageLantern can be the simpler choice when the buyer wants external monitoring without adopting a full incident and telemetry platform. | Better Stack is much stronger for on-call schedules, phone/SMS alerting, incident collaboration, telemetry, and enterprise controls. |
| StatusCake | Website monitoring suite | Small businesses that want website uptime, page speed, domain, SSL, and reporting from an established monitoring brand. | PageLantern includes 15 free monitors across HTTP, API assertions, SSL, domain, TCP, and heartbeat checks plus a hosted status page; its monitoring and incident workflow stay in one flat-priced workspace instead of splitting advanced status-page communication into a separate product. | StatusCake already covers a wide website-monitoring surface and has strong plan packaging for teams that want many checks. |
| Oh Dear | All-in-one website monitoring | Website owners and agencies that like bundled uptime, SSL, broken links, performance, DNS, cron, domain, status pages, and reporting. | PageLantern can compete if it stays highly operational: monitor tags, audit, incidents, fleet digest, and API/heartbeat workflows for teams managing many assets. | Oh Dear has a strong all-features-included model and a polished website-monitoring feature set. |
Competitors
What to compare in sales and product planning
Checkly
Hobby plan includes uptime monitors plus browser and API check runs; paid plans add more monitors, faster checks, more locations, SMS, phone, and Playwright capacity.
- PageLantern angle
- PageLantern should win with non-specialist setup, pragmatic website/API/domain/DNS/heartbeat coverage, and an operations UI that does not require synthetic-test expertise.
- Competitor strength
- Checkly is stronger for Playwright, multistep synthetic journeys, developer workflows, and checks managed as code.
UptimeRobot
Free tier keeps 50 monitors at 5-minute checks, but (as of the August 2026 pricing page) it excludes SSL expiry, domain expiry, DNS, heartbeat/cron, API monitoring, UDP, multi-location checks, and maintenance windows. Solo starts at $10/month ($9/month annually); webhooks, Zapier, and PagerDuty require Team at $41/month ($35/month annually). The free status page keeps UptimeRobot branding, and free history is limited to three months.
- PageLantern angle
- PageLantern includes on its free tier checks UptimeRobot now paywalls — SSL expiry, domain expiry, heartbeat/cron, and API checks with assertions — plus an alert channel that can be a webhook, Slack, or Teams, alongside incidents, audit trails, and fleet reports in one focused workspace.
- Competitor strength
- UptimeRobot offers the largest raw free monitor count among the hosted tools in this audit (50), three months of free history, a broad installed base, and a simple price story for basic HTTP, keyword, ping, and port checks.
Pingdom
Synthetic Monitoring starts at $10/month for 10 uptime checks and one advanced page-speed or transaction check. Pingdom has a trial but no permanent free tier, and remains focused on uptime, transactions, page speed, real-user monitoring, reports, alerts, and public status pages.
- PageLantern angle
- PageLantern can compete as a lighter, faster-to-understand product for owners and small teams that do not need enterprise synthetic monitoring.
- Competitor strength
- Pingdom is stronger for mature synthetic monitoring, transaction flows, page-speed diagnostics, and enterprise scale.
Better Stack
Free personal tier includes monitors, heartbeats, and a status page; paid responder plans bundle on-call, incident management, alerts, and telemetry options.
- PageLantern angle
- PageLantern can be the simpler choice when the buyer wants external monitoring without adopting a full incident and telemetry platform.
- Competitor strength
- Better Stack is much stronger for on-call schedules, phone/SMS alerting, incident collaboration, telemetry, and enterprise controls.
StatusCake
Free monitoring includes 10 uptime monitors at 5-minute intervals, one SSL check, one domain check, and a basic public display with 7 days of uptime. Superior is the paid monitoring entry. Branded, subscribable StatusCake Pages is separately packaged from a one-page Bronze tier; displayed currency and price vary by region.
- PageLantern angle
- PageLantern includes 15 free monitors across HTTP, API assertions, SSL, domain, TCP, and heartbeat checks plus a hosted status page; its monitoring and incident workflow stay in one flat-priced workspace instead of splitting advanced status-page communication into a separate product.
- Competitor strength
- StatusCake already covers a wide website-monitoring surface and has strong plan packaging for teams that want many checks.
Oh Dear
Solo is €15/month for 2 sites; all monitoring features, public status pages, API, reports, unlimited users, and integrations are included. Pricing scales by monitored site count, and there is a 10-day trial but no permanent free tier.
- PageLantern angle
- PageLantern can compete if it stays highly operational: monitor tags, audit, incidents, fleet digest, and API/heartbeat workflows for teams managing many assets.
- Competitor strength
- Oh Dear has a strong all-features-included model and a polished website-monitoring feature set.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
How is PageLantern different from Checkly?
Checkly is developer-first and stronger for Playwright, multistep synthetic journeys, monitoring as code, and CLI or Terraform-style workflows. PageLantern aims at pragmatic website, API, SSL, domain, DNS, and heartbeat coverage with an operations UI that does not require synthetic-test expertise.
Does PageLantern run browser checks?
Yes. PageLantern runs hosted browser checks and captures screenshots, traces, and console output, but it keeps DOM and content checks lighter than Checkly. If you need deep Playwright authoring and multistep browser journeys, Checkly is the stronger tool.
Can I manage PageLantern monitors as code?
PageLantern is configured through its portal and API. If monitoring-as-code, Playwright authoring, and Terraform or Pulumi management are central to your workflow, Checkly is built specifically for that.